ABSTRACT
Introduction: Combination of daratumumab (Dara) and lenalidomide (Len) may enhance the function of teclistamab (Tec), potentially resulting in improved antimyeloma activity in a broader population. We present initial safety and efficacy data of Tec-Dara- Len combination in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in a phase 1b study (MajesTEC-2;NCT04722146). Method(s): Eligible patients who received 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT), including a proteasome inhibitor and immune-modulatory drug, were given weekly doses of Tec (0.72-or- 1.5 mg/kg with step-up dosing) + Dara 1800 mg + Len 25 mg. Responses per International Myeloma Working Group criteria, adverse events (Aes) per CTCAE v5.0, and for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) per ASTCT guidelines, were assessed. Result(s): 32 patients received Tec-Dara- Len (0.72 mg/kg, n = 13;1.5 mg/kg, n = 19). At data cut-off (11 July 2022), median follow-up (range) was 5.78 months (1.0-10.4) and median treatment duration was 4.98 months (0.10-10.35). Median age was 62 years (38-75);87.5% were male. Median prior LOT was 2 (1-3), 18.8% were refractory to Dara and 28.1% refractory to Len. CRS was most frequent AE (81.3% [n = 26], all grade 1/2), 95% occurred during cycle1. Median time to onset was 2 days (1-8), median duration was 2 days (1-22). No ICANS were reported. Frequent Aes (>=25.0% across both dose levels) were neutropenia (75.0% [n = 24];grade 3/4: 68.8% [n = 22]), fatigue (43.8% [n = 14];grade 3/4: 6.3% [n = 2]), diarrhoea (37.5% [n = 12];all grade 1/2), insomnia (31.3% [n = 10];grade 3/4: 3.1% [n = 1]), cough (28.1% [n = 9];all grade 1/2), hypophosphatemia (25.0% [n = 8];all grade 1/2), and pyrexia (25% [n = 8];grade 3/4: 6.3% [n = 2]). Febrile neutropenia frequency was 12.5% (n = 4). Infections occurred in 24 patients (75.0%;grade 3/4: 28.1% [n = 9]). Most common were upper respiratory infection (21.9% [n = 7]), COVID-19 (21.9% [n = 7]), and pneumonia (21.9% [n = 7]). Three (9.4%) had COVID-19 pneumonia. One (3.1%) discontinued due to COVID-19 infection and this patient subsequently died of this infection. Overall response rate (ORR, median follow-up) was 13/13 (8.61 months) at 0.72 mg/kg and 13/16 evaluable patients (less mature at 4.17 months) at 1.5 mg/kg. 12 patients attained very good/better partial response at 0.72 mg/kg dose, and response was not mature for 1.5 mg/kg group. Median time to first response was 1.0 month (0.7-2.0). Preliminary pharmacokinetic concentrations of Tec-Dara- Len were similar as seen with Tec monotherapy. Tec-Dara- Len- treatment led to proinflammatory cytokine production and T-cell activation. Conclusion(s): The combination of Tec-Dara- Len has no new safety signals beyond those seen with Tec or Dara-Len individually. Promising ORR supports the potential for this combination to have enhanced early disease control through the addition of Tec. These data warrant further investigation.
ABSTRACT
Background: Prognosis of r/r B-NHL is detrimental. Potentially curative therapeutic approaches, such as autologous stem cell transplantation and innovative CAR-T cell therapy, require maximum disease control to achieve optimal results. Glofitamab is a new bispecific antibody, with a unique 2:1 molecular configuration resulting in superior potency compared with other CD20xCD3 bispecific antibodies with a 1:1 format. Aims: Based on these encouraging results, we included 5 heavily pretreated patients in the early access program of Glofitamab, available in our country. Methods: We collected the data of 5 consecutive patients with r/r B-NHL, who were treated with Glofitamab in our department during the last 15 months. Results: Three men and 2 women, median age of 57 years (38-62), were resistant to 4 (n = 3) and 5 (n = 2) previous lines of treatment. The underlying lymphoma was Richter's transformation of CLL after allogeneic transplantation (alloHSCT), transformed follicular lymphoma (tFL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), r/r diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after CAR-T therapy and gray zone lymphoma (GZL) transformed to DLBCL. The median number of Glofitamab cycles administered was 3 (2-7). All 5 patients responded early to treatment, which became apparent immediately after the first dose of 2.5 mg. The patient with Richter's syndrome achieved metabolic remission after the 4th cycle and underwent second alloHSCT after the 7th cycle. Unfortunately, he passed away 8 months after alloHSCT due to disseminated atypical mycobacterial infection, remaining however disease free. The patient with tFL also achieved metabolic remission, but the drug was discontinued after the 7th cycle due to COVID-19 infection. He died two months after Glofitamab interruption due to disease progression and CMV encephalitis. The patient with PMBCL, responded partially after Glofitamab and had mediastinal radiotherapy as bridging therapy to CAR-T therapy. As the latter was delayed due to CMV reactivation and CMV enteritis, our patient deceased due to progressive disease. The patient with DLBCL after CAR-T therapy had initial clinical response after two Glofitamab cycles. Due to severe COVID-19, we decided to hold Glofitamab. COVID-19 and disease progression led to his death, a few weeks after COVID-19 diagnosis. Finally, the patient with transformed GZL had Glofitamab administered as bridging therapy prior to CAR-T treatment. After 3 cycles, while she was prepared to proceed to CAR-T therapy, she was diagnosed with invasive aspergillosis. She is currently been treated with antifungal agents, whereas disease is still active. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 3 out of 5 patients. In all cases it was grade 1-2 and manifested at the first administration of the drug, after 4, 32 and 10 hours respectively, from infusion initiation. CRS was managed with antipyretics and steroids, whereas none patient required Intensive Care Unit support. Only one patient required tocilizumab. No Immune effector cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) was observed. Summary/Conclusion: Glofitamab is effective in treating patients with r/r aggressive B-cell NHL. Efficacy makes it an appropriate bridging tool to autologous, alloHSCT or CAR-T therapy. Nevertheless, relapse remains a challenge for r/r disease. Adverse events, such as CRS, were generally manageable. Given the fact that it was administered to heavily pretreated patients, caution to opportunistic pathogens should be paid. Indeed, toxicity profile may be proven to be more favorable if the agent is being administered earlier in therapeutic algorithms.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (R/R FL) often experience multiple relapses and require various lines of therapy. The ELARA and ZUMA-5 trials demonstrated high response rates along with acceptable safety profiles. We perform a phase 1b/2 single-center clinical trial of autologous point-of-care (POC) academic anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells for patients with R/R FL treated with at least 2 lines of systemic therapy (NCT02772198). Aims: To report outcomes of POC CAR T-cell therapy in patients with R/R FL. Methods: Adults with R/R FL underwent a single leukapheresis procedure. Fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated, activated, and transduced with a gammaretrovirus encoding for a CD19 CAR (based on an FMC63-derived ScFv, a CD28 costimulatory domain, and a CD3-ζ signaling domain). Lymphodepletion included fludarabine 25 mg/m2 over 3 days (days-4 to-2) and cyclophosphamide 900 mg/m2 once (day-2), followed by infusion of 1×106/kg CAR T-cells in the inpatient setting. Primary endpoints were response (by PET-CT, per Lugano criteria) at day 28, best response, and safety. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and production feasibility. Last follow-up was as of 02/2022. Results: All 19 patients enrolled received CAR T-cell infusion in a median of 11 days (IQR 10-11) after leukapheresis. The median age was 61 years (IQR 52-66). Five (26%) patients had Karnofsky performance status < 90%. Disease stage at enrollment was III-IV in 16 (84%) patients. Two (11%) patients had bulky disease;8 (42%) had LDH > upper limit of normal;and 16 (84%) had Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index ≥ 3. Disease status at enrollment was progressive disease (n=14, 74%), stable disease (n=3, 16%), or partial response (PR;n=2, 11%). Twelve patients (64%) were refractory to last treatment. Disease grade at most recent lymph node biopsy was 1 (n=3, 16%), 2 (n=11, 58%), or 3a (n=5, 26%). The median time from FL diagnosis was 3.9 years (IQR 2.5-4.6). Sixteen (84%) patients had progression of disease within 24 months of initial therapy. The number of prior therapies was ≥ 4 in 6 (32%) patients;and 5 (26%) patients underwent prior autologous transplantation. Grade III-IV cytokine release and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndromes occurred in 1 (5%) and 4 (21%) patients, respectively. One patient was infected with COVID-19 on the 5th day following cell infusion and was admitted to the intensive care unit. One patient had grade 3 atrial fibrillation. Severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <500/μL), thrombocytopenia (platelets <50K/μL) and anemia (hemoglobin <10g/dl) occurred in 15 (79%), 5 (26%), and 7 (37%) patients, respectively. No bleeding events or death were recorded following cell infusion. Response was evaluated in all patients. Overall response rate on day 28 was 84% (79% complete response [CR]). One patient with PR on day 28 achieved a CR after a year of follow-up. Three patients (16%) continued to progress following CAR infusion. All patients were alive at the last follow-up (median follow-up, 11.5 months [IQR 4-21]). One-year PFS was 74% (95% CI, 53-100). The median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (95% CI, 12.5-not reached). Estimated DOR at 1-year was 89% (95% CI, 71-100). Image: Summary/Conclusion: Point-of-Care anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, performed following a very short production time, induced high CR rate with an acceptable safety profile in a cohort of patients with high-risk R/R FL.
ABSTRACT
Background: Ide-cel, a BCMA directed CAR T-cell therapy, was FDA approved 3/26/2021 for the treatment of RRMM after 4 prior lines of therapy. We evaluated the real-world outcomes of patients treated with standard of care ide-cel under the commercial FDA label. Methods: Ten US academic centers contributed data to this effort independent of the manufacturer. As of 1/10/2022, 138 patients were leukapheresed with overall manufacturing failure in 6 (4%). 108 patients were infused ≥ 30 days prior to data-cut off and constitute the study population for this retrospective analysis. Results: Table describes the study population compared to the pivotal KarMMa-1 trial (Munshi et al, NEJM 2021). Patients in our study were less likely to have ECOG PS of 0/1 (77%) and more likely to be penta-refractory (41%). 67% of patients would not have met eligibility criteria for KarMMa. Common reasons for ineligibility (> 1 reason in 22% patients) were co-morbidities (28%), cytopenias (22%), prior therapy with alloSCT/ CAR-T/other BCMA therapy (19%), CNS myeloma/non-measurable disease/plasma cell leukemia (13%), and fitness (12%). 81% of patients received bridging therapy. Toxicity was comparable to that seen in KarMMa-1. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was seen in 82% (> grade 3: 4%) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in 15% (> grade 3: 5%) of patients, respectively. Tocilizumab and steroids were used in 72% and 25% of patients, respectively. Infections were seen in 34% of patients. Day 30 response was evaluable in 104 patients. Response rates were: ≥ partial response, 83%;≥ very good partial response, 64%;and ≥ complete response (CR), 34%. 11% of patients have died by data cut-off, 7 due to disease progression and 5 due to other causes (1 grade 5 CRS, 1 hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, 1 progressive neurological weakness, 2 COVID-19). Conclusions: This multicenter retrospective study delineates the real-world outcomes of ide-cel CAR T-cell therapy for RRMM. Despite more patients being penta-refractory and less fit compared to the pivotal KarMMa trial, safety and 30-day responses in the real-world setting (overall response rate: 83%, CR: 34%) are comparable to the clinical trial population. Follow-up is ongoing and updated data will be presented.
ABSTRACT
Background: Glofit is a novel, CD20xCD3 T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody that provides monovalent binding to CD3 on T cells and bivalent binding to CD20 on B cells. As monotherapy, Glofit has shown promising response rates with manageable safety in R/R B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) patients (pts;[Carlo-Stella et al. EHA 2021]). Because of their distinct and complementary mechanism of action, there is a rationale for combining Glofit with the anti-CD79b-targeted antibody-drug conjugate, Pola. NP39488 (NCT03533283) is a Phase Ib/II, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation (DE) and expansion study evaluating Glofit + Pola or atezolizumab in R/R B-NHL pts (Hutchings et al. ASH 2019). Here, we report preliminary safety and efficacy data for Glofit + Pola in pts with R/R DLBCL during DE and expansion at the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D). Methods: To mitigate the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), a single 1000mg dose of obinutuzumab pre-treatment was administered on Cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 1 alongside step-up dosing (SUD) of Glofit on C1D8 and C1D15. Glofit was subsequently administered at the target dose from C2D1, every 3 weeks up to C12. Pola was administered at 1.8mg/kg on C1D2 and then on D1 of each subsequent cycle up to C6. The primary objective was to establish the RP2D of Glofit in combination with Pola. Results: As of June 10, 2021 (clinical cut-off date [CCOD]), 44 pts were treated with ≥1 cycle;median follow-up was 3.2 months (95% confidence interval: 1.4-3.5). In the first DE cohort, 7 pts had received Glofit at 2.5mg (C1D8)/10mg (C1D15)/10mg (C2D1 onwards) plus Pola. In the second DE cohort, 4 pts received the Glofit target dose of 30mg on C1D15 and this was established as the RP2D. During the expansion phase at RP2D, an additional 34 pts were treated with ≥1 cycle. Of 44 pts, 29 (66%) had histology of R/R DLBCL, 8 (18%) had R/R high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL;2 HGBCL not otherwise specified;5 double-hit DLBCL;1 triple-hit DLBCL) and 7 (16%) had R/R transformed follicular lymphoma. Pts (61% male) had a median age of 65.5 years (range: 29-82) and received a median of two prior lines (range: 1−5). Twenty-eight (64%) pts were refractory to their last therapy;2 pts had not been treated with Glofit at the CCOD. The most frequent adverse event (AE) was CRS (55%;23/42 pts): Grade (Gr) 1 (n=18);Gr 2 (n=7);no Gr ≥3 CRS events were observed (Lee et al. 2019 ASTCT criteria). Of the 7 pts with Gr 2 CRS, 5 were treated with tocilizumab and fluids for hypotension, and 4 pts were treated with low-flow oxygen due to hypoxia. None of the pts required vasopressors or intensive care unit admission. Gr >3 AEs occurred in 52% (n=23) of pts;most commonly, neutropenia (27%) and anemia (23%). For neurological AEs (NAEs), 13 events were reported in 13 patients (29.5%, 13/44 pts), all were limited to Gr 1−2. The most common NAEs were headache and (11%, 5/44 pts) and insomnia (4.5%, 2/44 pts). No immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome-like AEs were reported. Peripheral neuropathy due to Pola was reported in 5/44 pts (11%);all events were Gr 1. Serious AEs occurred in 22 pts (52%);none were CNS or neurological events. One pt experienced fatal COVID-19 pneumonia (not related). Study treatment was discontinued in 2 pts due to AEs (Gr 4 thrombocytopenia, and Gr 3 worsening of pre-existing renal impairment;both events were related to Glofit and Pola). At CCOD 33/44 pts were evaluable for interim (after 2 cycles, 1 target dose of Glofit) or primary (after 8 cycles) response;6/33 pts had experienced progressive disease and discontinued study treatment. Overall response (OR) rate for both dosing cohorts was 73% (24/33) and complete response (CR) rate, per investigator was 51.5% (17/33). Of 7 pts treated with 2.5/10/10mg SUD Glofit, OR and CR rates were both 86% (6/7);durable responses at ≥6 months post-end of treatment were observed. Of 26 pts treated with 2.5/10/30 mg SUD Glofit, OR rate was 73% (19/26) and CR rate was 46% (12/26);11.5% (3/26) pts had stable disease after 2 cycles of therapy. Duration of response and time on study by dosing cohort is shown in Figure. Biomarker and pharmacokinetic data will be provided. Conclusions: Glofit in combination with Pola showed tolerable safety and encouraging preliminary efficacy in R/R DLBCL pts. CRS and NAEs were limited to Gr 1 or 2, no new safety signals were detected for this combination, and the safety profile was consistent with that of the individual drugs. Updated data will be presented. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Hutchings: Genmab: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Celgene: Research Funding;Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding;Incyte: Research Funding;Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis: Research Funding. Sureda: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Speakers Bureau;Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Bluebird: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Roche: Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel;GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Mundipharma: Consultancy;MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Terol: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Research Funding;Roche: Consultancy;BMS: Consultancy;Hospital Clinico Valencia: Current Employment;Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel;Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel;Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Research Funding;Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel. Bosch Albareda: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria;Abbvie: Consultancy;AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding;Kite: Honoraria;Sanofi: Honoraria;Lilly: Honoraria. Corradini: KiowaKirin;Incyte;Daiichi Sankyo;Janssen;F. Hoffman-La Roche;Kite;Servier: Consultancy;AbbVie, ADC Theraputics, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, KyowaKirin, Nerviano Medical Science, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Honoraria;Amgen;Takeda;AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations;Novartis;Gilead;Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel and accommodations;BMS: Other: Travel and accommodation;Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria;Incyte: Consultancy;AbbVie, ADC Theraputics, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, KyowaKirin, Nerviano Medical Science, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy;Novartis, Janssen, Celgene, BMS, Takeda, Gilead/Kite, Amgen, AbbVie: Other: travel and accomodations. Larsen: Novartis: Consultancy;Gilead: Consultancy;Odense University Hospital, Denmark: Current Employment;Celgene: Consultancy;BMS: Consultancy. Rueda Dominguez: Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga: Current Employment;Roch : Consultancy;Takeda: Consultancy;Gilead: Consultancy;Merck Serono: Consultancy;BMS: Consultancy;MSD: Consultancy. Panchal: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment. Bottos: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Carlile: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company;AstraZeneca: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months. Wang: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment;Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Filézac De L'Étang: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tandon: Roche Products Ltd: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Sellam: Roche: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gritti: Takeda: Consultancy;Roche: Consultancy;Kite Gilead: Consultancy;IQvia: Consultancy;Italfarmaco: Consultancy;Clinigen: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Glofitamab is a full-length, humanized immunoglobulin G1 bispecific antibody with a 2:1 molecular format that facilitates bivalent binding to CD20 on B-cells, and monovalent binding to CD3 on T-cells. Glofitamab redirects T cells to engage and eliminate malignant B cells. Glofitamab is an investigational agent. Polatuzumab vedotin (Polivy) is a CD79b-directed antibody-drug conjugate indicated in combination with bendamustine and a rituximab product for the treatment of adult pts with relapsed or refractory DLBCL, not otherwise specified, after at least two prior therapies.
ABSTRACT
Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive sub-type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma(Liu, et al. Am J Hematol 2019). All three approved CD19-directed CAR-T therapies (axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, lisocabtagene maraleucel) are associated with toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) that can be severe, resulting in non-relapse mortality, ICU admission, and significant non-drug related health resource utilization which represent barriers to access and adoption (Nabhan, et al. J Clin. Pathway 2017). Studies have shown that early elevation of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) levels 1-day post CAR-T infusion correlates with severe ICANS (Rossi, et al. EMA Workshop 2016), which is a negative prognostic factor for overall survival (Karschnia, et al. Blood 2019). It has been proposed that upon contact with the tumor, CAR-Ts produce GM-CSF, which serves as a communication conduit between the specific immune response of CAR-T and the off-target inflammatory cascade produced by myeloid lineage cells, causing myeloid cells to expand and promote the production of other downstream proinflammatory chemokines (MCP-1, IL-8, IP-10), cytokines (IL-1, IL-6), and other markers of systemic inflammation (CRP, Ferritin) (Sterner, et al. Blood 2019). Moreover, IL-6 is predominately released by tumor cells in a contact-independent manner (Barrett et al. Blood 2016), which helps explain why the prophylactic administration of tocilizumab is not effective in reducing the overall incidence of CRS or ICANS, as this cytokine is downstream in the inflammatory cascade. Further, the prophylactic use of tocilizumab has been shown to increase the incidence of all-grades and grade >3 ICANS (Locke, et al. Blood 2017). Lenzilumab is a novel Humaneered ® monoclonal antibody that neutralizes GM-CSF and has demonstrated potential to reduce the hyper-immune mediated cytokine storm induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection and significantly improve the likelihood of survival without ventilation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, as reported in the LIVE-AIR phase 3 study (Temesgen, et al. medRxiv 2021). Methods: Eligible patients are adults (≥ 18 y) with relapsed or refractory DLBCL or are chemorefractory. Prior therapy must have included an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and an anthracycline-containing regimen. Patients will undergo leukapheresis and may receive optional corticosteroid bridging therapy. Patients will then receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy on Days ‒3 to ‒5 followed by infusion of lenzilumab on Day 0, 6-hrs prior to CAR-T infusion. Approximately 40 accredited sites across the U.S. certified to administer the three commercially available CAR-Ts have been engaged to participate in this 2-part study. In Part 1, all patients will receive lenzilumab 1800mg via a single 2-hour infusion prior to CAR-T administration. The objective of Part 1 is to evaluate the optimal regimen and assess whether a second dose of lenzilumab post-CAR-T infusion is required. A translational assessment of GM-CSF axis suppression, levels of CAR-T cells in blood, other inflammatory markers and lenzilumab PK/PD will be evaluated, along with the incidence and severity of CRS and ICANS, objective response rates (ORR) and rates of complete response (CR) by Day 28 to select the optimal regimen to carry forward into Part 2. The objective of Part 2 is to confirm whether lenzilumab can improve the toxicity and tolerance of CAR-T while maintaining or improving efficacy and durability of response. Up to 250 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive lenzilumab or placebo with CAR-T per standard of care. The primary endpoint of the study is incidence of grade >2 CRS and/or ICANS by Day 28, with a key secondary endpoint of CR at 6-months in patients without grade ≥ 2 CRS and/or ICANS at Day 28 (Toxicity-free CR). This design and sample size yields 90% power to detect a 50% reduction in the primary outcome measure. Secondary endpoints includ incidence of all grades and grade >3 CRS and/or ICANS, respectively;ORR and CR at 1, 3, 6, 12 months;durability of CR;progression-free survival, overall survival and health related quality of life using validated patient reported outcome measures. In addition, the study will explore the CRS and ICANS grading criteria that have been utilized with each of the approved CAR-Ts. Disclosures: Kenderian: Humanigen, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Durrant: Humanigen, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Chappell: Humanigen Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Ahmed: Humanigen Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kilcoyne: Humanigen, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.